|
|
Post by thejazlive on Mar 14, 2015 18:47:37 GMT -5
THIS RULE IS TO HELP MANAGERS MAKE THEIR TWO GOALIE START MINIMUMS EACH WEEK AND PREVENT THEM FROM NOT EARNING THOSE GOALIE CATEGORY STATS. (KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS RULE CONCEPT IS NEGATED IF YOUR GOALIE GETS INJURED).
Please vote sometime during our fantasy playoffs
If you need to understand the proposed rule further do so by leaving a post below or email me at jr76adam@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyovitt on Mar 15, 2015 22:43:31 GMT -5
Voted
|
|
|
|
Post by dbacksfan414 on Mar 18, 2015 0:37:19 GMT -5
Done
|
|
|
|
Post by zachmyles on Mar 22, 2015 5:52:35 GMT -5
Voted
|
|
|
|
Post by edmonton on Mar 29, 2015 21:20:05 GMT -5
Shouldn't there be an option of "no limit"? We are voting HOW we want to change the rule before we even vote IF we want to change the rule.
I vote no limit, but for this poll I guess I'll say 6.
|
|
|
|
Post by dbacksfan414 on Mar 30, 2015 7:20:15 GMT -5
I would also vote for no limit if it was an option.
|
|
|
|
Post by Louis on Mar 30, 2015 14:56:21 GMT -5
6 is ridiculous ...
|
|
|
|
Post by thejazlive on Mar 31, 2015 23:46:38 GMT -5
Shouldn't there be an option of "no limit"? We are voting HOW we want to change the rule before we even vote IF we want to change the rule. I vote no limit, but for this poll I guess I'll say 6. I know you've seen all the rule proposals and the motions the league has gone through this year, so if someone makes a legit rule change request, it is my responsibility to put it up to a vote, if it please everyone better, than consider 6 goalies like a NO LIMIT... though six goalies should feel like a hell of a lot for one team in my opinion. I can honestly see someone just stacking up with goalies, and have the rest of their roster depleted. To be honest I am in a baseball league where someone is intentionally hording 1/3 of closers, and because of it the rest of his team isnt what it could be. Making one team in the league uncompetitive based on their personal tactic and objective. |
|
|
|
Post by thejazlive on Mar 31, 2015 23:48:40 GMT -5
I voted for 5 personally because I feel that is the most reasonable amount coming from an impartial perspective.
|
|
