|
Post by thejazlive on Aug 13, 2012 22:56:04 GMT -5
Hey guys,
We talked a little about this during the last season of whether a team should be allowed to keep N/A players on their parent roster. How many or if none at all.
Now I think we are referring to i moreso keeping prospects who are under our 82 game limit on our parent roster and not NHL players.
Quick example (I'll use my fantasy baseball team) i have Daniel Bard on both of my fantasy baseball teams, and he has been in the minors since mid June but I can't send him down to my farm since he is over our leagues prospect innings limit. But I want to keep him because I think he will still be a valuable player.
So this is where I think it is okay to keep NHL players on parent roster if you have no room on your farm (if you do you must send him down). But having prospects on parents roster may be the issue that needs to be voted on. Since we want to prevent owners lack of ability to compete with his team with prospect on his parent roster.
|
|
|
Post by Louis on Aug 15, 2012 14:45:11 GMT -5
I voted for 0
Reason is i saw that a couple of time where guys who where close to finishing last decided to trade away good players for great prospect , keeping them on their current roster and drop to last place to get the best pick in the draft... I say if a guy is NA for more then a week he has to be send down and if farm club is full then release the players or cut another to make space.
My opinion
Have a good one all
|
|
|
Post by ccastro82 on Aug 15, 2012 14:46:11 GMT -5
Just throwing this out there. I'm in a fantasy baseball league that also has a MILB system and when a player (regardless of inning/AB limit) is sent to the minors he becomes MILB eligible again. The only caveat is that once he's called back up he must immediately be promoted back to your regular roster again.
It's for special cases like Bard, Travis Snider, etc. who keep going back & forth. You may want to bring up that proposal with your commish.
|
|
|
Post by zachmyles on Sept 5, 2012 0:42:32 GMT -5
I'd vote for "as many as you want" but since the highest option is 3, that's what i'll go with
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2012 12:10:28 GMT -5
If a player is sent to the minors, since when can we not send him down (regardless of how many GP's he has)?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your Bard example but I think Bard could be sent down if he was assigned to the minors.
Anyway, it's your roster spots. If you want to fill them with NA's, I'm VERY OK with that!
So I too say keep as many as you want. Voted 3. But I think this is an unecessary poll and proposal.
|
|
|
Post by thejazlive on Sept 28, 2012 13:49:30 GMT -5
Results Are In
Just so that there is any confusion the rule is you can only keep 2 N/A players on your parent roster at any time.
|
|